HM Treasury Crypto Policy and Regulations: What You Need to Know in 2025

HM Treasury Crypto Policy and Regulations: What You Need to Know in 2025

For years, the UK waited. Investors, startups, and banks all asked: When will the government finally set clear rules for crypto? On April 29, 2025, HM Treasury answered. The draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Cryptoassets) Order 2025 wasn’t just another consultation paper-it was the first real blueprint for how crypto will work under UK law. This isn’t about banning crypto. It’s about bringing it inside the same legal cage as banks, brokers, and payment processors. And it’s already changing how businesses operate.

What’s Actually Regulated Now?

The new rules don’t cover every crypto activity. They focus on five specific areas where consumer risk is highest and market integrity is most at stake:

  • Running a crypto trading exchange
  • Issuing stablecoins
  • Buying or selling qualifying cryptoassets
  • Holding cryptoassets for clients (custody)
  • Arranging crypto trades for others

If your business does any of these five things with UK customers, you now need FCA authorization. No exceptions. No loopholes. This means firms like Binance, Kraken, or Coinbase can’t just operate in the UK anymore without jumping through the same hoops as a UK bank. The FCA will check their financial health, anti-fraud systems, customer service policies, and cybersecurity. Same standards. Same paperwork. Same penalties for failure.

Stablecoins Are the Big Target

Stablecoins-crypto coins pegged to the pound, dollar, or euro-are the centerpiece of this new regime. The UK is one of the first major economies to regulate stablecoin issuers directly. If you’re based in the UK and you issue a stablecoin, you’re now a regulated financial institution. You need capital reserves, audit trails, redemption guarantees, and a clear plan if things go wrong.

But here’s the twist: the rules only apply to UK-based issuers. A stablecoin issued in the US or Singapore can still be traded by UK users. HM Treasury didn’t try to control every stablecoin on the planet. Instead, they focused on where the risk starts: the issuer. If a UK person buys USDC or USDT, they’re still protected by existing consumer laws and the FCA’s enforcement powers-but the issuer itself isn’t under UK supervision. This gives UK firms a chance to compete globally while keeping British consumers safe.

DeFi Is Still Mostly Off-Limits

One of the smartest moves in this whole plan is what’s not regulated. Truly decentralized finance-like Uniswap, Aave, or Compound-won’t be forced to get FCA approval. Why? Because there’s no company, no CEO, no legal entity to hold accountable. The FCA will look for a "controlling party." If a group of developers or a foundation has real power over the protocol, they might be caught. But if it’s just code running on a blockchain with no central team? That’s out of scope.

This isn’t a loophole. It’s a realistic acknowledgment that some parts of crypto can’t be regulated the same way as a bank. Trying to force compliance on decentralized networks would just push them offshore or make them harder to use. The UK is betting that smart regulation on the entry points-exchanges, custodians, issuers-is enough to protect users without killing innovation.

A mad scientist fusing a stablecoin into a bank vault while a decentralized blockchain monster escapes.

How This Compares to MiCA and Other Regions

The UK didn’t start from scratch. They looked at the EU’s MiCA regulation and took the best parts. Both systems regulate the same five activities. Both require FCA or ESMA-style authorizations. Both treat stablecoins as financial instruments. But there are key differences.

First, MiCA applies to all stablecoin issuers globally if they want to sell in the EU. The UK only regulates UK issuers. Second, MiCA has strict rules on algorithmic stablecoins and reserve disclosures. The UK’s version is simpler-focus on capital, transparency, and redemption. Third, the UK didn’t create a whole new regulator. It just added crypto to the FCA’s existing powers. That means firms already licensed by the FCA for other services can adapt faster.

Compared to the US, where regulation is a patchwork of state and federal rules, the UK’s approach is cleaner. Compared to Singapore or Switzerland, which are more permissive, the UK is stricter on consumer protection. It’s not the most lenient. It’s not the most restrictive. It’s a middle path designed for a financial hub.

What Businesses Must Do Now

If you’re running a crypto business in the UK, here’s what you need to do by the end of 2025:

  1. Figure out if your activity falls under the five regulated categories.
  2. Check if you’re a UK issuer of a stablecoin-even if you’re small.
  3. Start preparing your FCA application: financial statements, compliance manuals, KYC/AML systems, and risk controls.
  4. Don’t assume your existing crypto license from another country works here. The FCA doesn’t recognize foreign approvals.
  5. Watch for the next wave: anti-money laundering updates and market abuse rules coming later in 2025.

Traditional banks and asset managers have an advantage. They already have compliance teams, audit trails, and capital buffers. Crypto-native startups? They’re starting from zero. Many will need to hire lawyers, auditors, and tech security experts just to apply. That’s expensive. Some small firms may just exit the UK market.

An investor watches a protective shield over their crypto wallet as unlicensed firms explode outside.

What’s Coming Next?

The April 2025 draft isn’t the final word. HM Treasury published another set of proposed changes on September 2, 2025, targeting money laundering rules for crypto firms. These updates will tighten customer checks, ban pooled client accounts (a common crypto loophole), and require better reporting to financial intelligence units.

Two more big pieces are still missing:

  • Market abuse rules: insider trading, price manipulation, and spoofing in crypto markets.
  • Admissions and disclosures: what crypto firms must tell investors before they buy.

These are expected by early 2026. The FCA also plans to release detailed rulebooks and guidance documents by mid-year. Until then, firms are operating in a gray zone-officially unlicensed but expected to behave as if they’re already regulated.

Why This Matters for Everyone

This isn’t just for crypto companies. It’s for anyone who uses crypto.

For investors: you’ll have more protection. If a UK-based exchange goes bust, you might get compensation from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS)-just like with a bank. If you hold a UK-issued stablecoin, you’ll know it’s backed by real assets.

For businesses: the UK is signaling it wants to be a global crypto hub. Clear rules attract capital. Clear rules attract talent. Clear rules attract innovation. London could become the place where compliant crypto firms choose to base themselves-not because it’s cheap, but because it’s predictable.

For regulators: this is a test. Can you protect people without killing innovation? Can you regulate without overcomplicating? The UK’s approach tries to answer both. If it works, other countries-from Canada to Australia to Japan-will copy it. If it fails, crypto will keep moving to places with fewer rules.

Right now, the UK is walking a tightrope. But for the first time, there’s a rope. And it’s not going anywhere.

Are all cryptocurrencies regulated under the new HM Treasury rules?

No. Only five specific activities are regulated: running a trading exchange, issuing stablecoins, dealing in qualifying cryptoassets, custody services, and arranging trades. Truly decentralized protocols like Uniswap or Aave aren’t covered unless a central team controls them. Bitcoin and Ethereum as assets aren’t regulated directly-only how they’re traded or held.

Do I need FCA authorization if I’m a UK resident buying crypto for myself?

No. The rules apply to businesses offering services, not individual investors. If you buy Bitcoin on a regulated exchange or hold it in your own wallet, you’re not required to get licensed. But you should only use platforms that are FCA-authorized to reduce your risk.

What happens if a crypto firm operates in the UK without FCA approval?

They’re breaking the law. The FCA can block their website, freeze their bank accounts, fine them, or even pursue criminal charges. Non-compliant firms will be publicly listed as unauthorized. UK banks are also required to cut off services to unlicensed crypto businesses. Operating without approval is no longer a gray area-it’s a high-risk gamble.

Are stablecoins from the US or EU legal to use in the UK?

Yes. The UK only regulates stablecoin issuers based in the UK. US-issued stablecoins like USDC or USDT can still be bought and sold by UK residents through exchanges. However, UK exchanges offering these must be FCA-authorized, and they must clearly disclose the issuer’s location and risks.

When will the rules become official?

The draft legislation was open for public comment until May 23, 2025. After that, it went through Parliament for final approval. As of November 2025, the rules are expected to be fully in force by early 2026. Firms have until then to apply for authorization. The FCA has already started reviewing applications.

Will this make crypto more expensive to use in the UK?

It already has. Authorized firms face higher compliance costs-audits, legal fees, security systems-which often get passed to users through higher trading fees or lower yields. But you’re also getting more protection. If an FCA-licensed exchange fails, you might recover your funds through the FSCS. For many, that trade-off is worth it.

17 Comments
  1. Gavin Jones

    Finally some clarity! Been waiting years for this. The UK’s not banning crypto, it’s bringing it into the fold like a responsible adult. No more wild west, no more shady exchanges pretending they’re legit. FCA authorization? Good. If you’re serious about this space, you’ll jump through the hoops. The rest? Let ‘em vanish into the ether.

  2. Mauricio Picirillo

    Love that they’re not trying to regulate DeFi. That’s the whole point of it, man. If you force a blockchain protocol to get a business license, you’re basically asking a river to fill out tax forms. Smart move. Let the code run, regulate the gatekeepers. 🙌

  3. Liz Watson

    Oh wow. The UK is ‘protecting consumers’ now? After letting every crypto scam under the sun run rampant for a decade? This isn’t regulation-it’s damage control with a fancy press release. And don’t get me started on ‘UK-based issuers only.’ So US stablecoins are fine? That’s like saying ‘we’ll regulate the bank teller but not the vault.’ LOL.

  4. Rachel Anderson

    MY HEART IS RACING. THIS IS IT. THE MOMENT CRYPTO GROWS UP. 🥹 Tears. I cried when I read the part about stablecoin issuers needing capital reserves. Finally. Someone gets it. The FCA isn’t just a regulator-it’s a guardian angel in a pinstripe suit. London’s gonna be the Silicon Valley of compliant crypto. I’m moving there. I’m selling my NFTs to buy a flat in Shoreditch.

  5. Hamish Britton

    Big win for small devs. The fact that they didn’t go after Uniswap means they actually understand decentralization. Most governments would’ve tried to sue a smart contract. This feels like a real attempt to balance safety and freedom. Not perfect, but way better than the US mess.

  6. Robert Astel

    you know what’s funny? like, really funny? the whole idea that you can regulate a ‘stablecoin issuer’ but not the actual blockchain? like, if i mint usdc on ethereum, and then the issuer goes bankrupt, who’s responsible? the smart contract? the miners? the guy who wrote the whitepaper in 2014? it’s like regulating the weather by telling clouds to stop raining. the system is inherently decentralized so trying to pin liability on one entity is… kinda absurd? but also kinda necessary? idk. i’m confused. but also excited? 🤔

  7. Andrew Parker

    This is the end of an era… and the beginning of a new one. 💔 The crypto dream-unregulated, wild, free-was beautiful. But beauty fades. Now we have compliance. Now we have audits. Now we have lawyers. And yes, it’s sad. But isn’t that what growing up means? We traded chaos for safety. We traded freedom for protection. And maybe… maybe that’s the price of legitimacy. 🕊️ #CryptoGrownUp

  8. Kevin Hayes

    The UK’s approach is structurally sound. By focusing on intermediaries rather than protocols, they avoid the fundamental impossibility of regulating decentralized systems. This mirrors the legal logic behind liability for ISPs or payment processors-regulate the point of contact, not the underlying network. The MiCA comparison is apt, but the UK’s model is more elegant: no new regulator, no bureaucratic overhang. It’s regulatory minimalism with teeth. The real test will be enforcement-will the FCA have the resources to monitor thousands of entities? That’s the next frontier.

  9. Katherine Wagner

    so like… regulated exchanges? cool. but what about me buying eth on binance? is that illegal? or do i just get to hope the exchange doesn’t get shut down? also why are stablecoins regulated like banks but btc isn’t? btc is literally more money than usdc. this makes no sense. also who decided ‘qualifying cryptoassets’? who’s the judge? the fca? the pope? the guy who made the first bitcoin whitepaper? no one knows. i’m confused. and also tired. 🙄

  10. ratheesh chandran

    bro this is good but u forgot one thing… what if i live in nigeria and i use a uk exchange? do i get fscs protection? what if i send my crypto to a friend in ghana? is that illegal? also i heard the fca is gonna ban p2p trading? is that true? plz answer i need to know for my business. i have 3000 customers. they all use usdt. i dont know what to do. help me.

  11. Hannah Kleyn

    I’ve been watching this unfold for months. The way they’re handling stablecoins is actually brilliant. You don’t need to regulate every single transaction-you regulate the source. It’s like water treatment plants instead of filtering every glass. And the fact they left DeFi alone? That’s the kind of restraint most regulators don’t have. I’m curious how long it’ll take for the first UK-issued stablecoin to launch. My guess? Under 12 months. And it’ll probably be backed by sterling treasury bills. I’m already bookmarking the launch page.

  12. gary buena

    ok but like… if i’m a small dev building a wallet app and i don’t hold keys… am i still regulated? because i’m not custodying, i’m not issuing, i’m just… routing. what’s the line? also i think they should just let people use usdt without all this fuss. why make it harder? also typo: ‘fca’ not ‘FCA’ lol

  13. Vanshika Bahiya

    For anyone in India or Africa reading this: this is your blueprint. The UK didn’t ban innovation, they set guardrails. If you’re building a crypto product, don’t wait for your country to catch up-build to UK standards. It’s the global language of compliance now. FCA authorization isn’t a burden-it’s your passport to the world. Start reading the FCA handbook today. It’s free. It’s clear. And it’s your roadmap.

  14. Albert Melkonian

    One of the most thoughtfully designed regulatory frameworks I’ve seen in the digital asset space. The UK has avoided the trap of overreach by focusing on functional risk-not technological form. The exclusion of DeFi is not a loophole; it’s a recognition of ontological limits. The regulation of custody, issuance, and trading interfaces creates a friction layer that protects consumers without stifling innovation. This is not merely policy-it’s institutional wisdom. The world will be watching.

  15. Kelly McSwiggan

    Let’s be real. This is just a tax grab wrapped in a compliance blanket. Higher fees, more paperwork, more lawyers. All so the FCA can say ‘we did something.’ Meanwhile, the real players-whales, hedge funds, offshore entities-will just move to Gibraltar or Dubai. The average retail user? They’ll pay more for less. And the ‘FSCS protection’? That’s only if the exchange didn’t launder your funds through a shell company in the Caymans. Classic.

  16. Byron Kelleher

    Hey, I’m not a crypto expert but I’ve been holding since 2017 and this feels like a good step. I know it’s not perfect but at least we’re moving forward instead of just yelling at each other on Twitter. I’ve got friends who lost money on sketchy exchanges-this gives them some hope. Let’s not trash the effort because it’s not perfect. Progress > perfection. Keep going, UK.

  17. Cherbey Gift

    My people in Lagos are laughing at this. ‘UK regulating crypto?’ Like they think they own the blockchain? We use USDT because it works. We don’t care if it’s ‘UK-issued’ or ‘FCA-approved.’ We care if it lands in our wallet. This is colonial thinking dressed in compliance. The world doesn’t need another rulebook from London. It needs access. Real access. Not permission.

Write a comment