Avascriptions Crypto Exchange Review: Red Flags and Missing Info

Avascriptions Crypto Exchange Review: Red Flags and Missing Info

Crypto Exchange Red Flag Checker

Verify Exchange Trustworthiness

This tool helps you identify red flags in crypto exchanges. Based on the article about Avascriptions, a legitimate exchange should have these key trust indicators. Select the indicators you see for the exchange you're evaluating.

Select the red flags present in the exchange you're evaluating and click "Check Exchange Trustworthiness".

Before you put any money into Avascriptions, you need to know this: there’s almost nothing reliable about it. No verified team, no whitepaper, no user reviews, no security audits, and it’s listed as a scam site by a major crypto monitoring service. This isn’t a case of a new exchange struggling to grow - this is a case of missing basic trust signals that every legitimate crypto platform has.

What Is Avascriptions Supposed to Be?

Avascriptions claims to be a centralized crypto exchange built on the Avalanche blockchain, focused on ASC-20 tokens. These are custom tokens created using a protocol they developed, similar to ERC-20 on Ethereum. The platform lets users mint, trade, and inscribe these tokens directly on-chain. It also offers a developer API for third-party tools like wallets and browsers.

They’ve created a badge system for traders based on AVAX trading volume: Blue Badge (20,000 AVAX), Gold (100,000 AVAX), Red (500,000 AVAX), and Legendary (2.5 million AVAX). Sounds impressive - until you realize no one can verify those numbers. There’s no public blockchain explorer link, no transaction history, no way to check if those traders even exist.

The Scam Alert That Can’t Be Ignored

CryptoLinks, a well-known crypto scam tracking database, explicitly lists Avascriptions as a scam site. Their reasoning is blunt: the team hides their identity, has a bad reputation, and either has no whitepaper or a terrible one. That’s not a minor warning - it’s a red flag that appears on platforms only after multiple reports and evidence of deception.

No reputable crypto publication - CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, The Block - has written about Avascriptions. No blockchain security firm like CertiK or PeckShield has audited their smart contracts. No YouTube reviewer has tested the platform. That silence isn’t normal. It’s a sign.

No Trading Data. No Users. No Proof.

CoinCarp, a crypto data aggregator, shows every key metric for Avascriptions as “unknown”: 24-hour volume, number of trading pairs, launch date, margin trading, proof of reserves, website traffic, Twitter followers, even cybersecurity score. If you can’t measure it, you can’t trust it.

The $AVASC token is listed on Bitget, but that doesn’t mean Avascriptions is legit. Many scam tokens get listed on third-party exchanges to create false legitimacy. Bitget doesn’t verify every token’s team or project - they just allow listings. The fact that step-by-step guides exist for buying $AVASC with credit cards in Zambia doesn’t mean it’s safe - it means people are being targeted in regions with less crypto regulation.

A confused user facing a glitching screen showing fake badges and a faceless monster, with empty social media posts in the background.

Where Are the Users?

Check Reddit. Check Trustpilot. Check G2. Check any crypto forum. You won’t find a single honest review. Not one. Not even a complaint. That’s not because it’s too new - it’s because people aren’t using it, or they’ve already been burned and left quietly.

Legitimate exchanges have thousands of user posts. Binance has hundreds of thousands. Even small DEXs like Trader Joe or Pangolin have active Discord servers and Reddit threads. Avascriptions has Twitter and Telegram accounts - but no follower counts, no engagement metrics, no screenshots of real trades. Just empty channels.

How Do You Even Use It?

No one knows how to sign up. No one knows if you need KYC. No one knows what fees they charge. No one knows how long withdrawals take. No one knows if they support fiat deposits (USD, EUR, etc.). The website doesn’t say. The FAQ doesn’t exist. The support email? Unanswered.

Even their developer API - the one thing that sounds technically solid - has no documentation. No rate limits. No authentication method. No code examples. You can’t build on top of something that doesn’t show you how it works.

Regulatory Black Hole

Avascriptions doesn’t disclose where it’s registered. No license. No jurisdiction. No compliance team. In 2025, that’s a dealbreaker. Every major exchange - even those in less regulated countries - at least claims to follow AML/KYC rules. Avascriptions says nothing. That’s not privacy. That’s evasion.

Countries like the U.S., EU, UK, and Japan are cracking down hard on unlicensed exchanges. If you deposit money into Avascriptions and it shuts down tomorrow, you have zero legal recourse. No regulator will help you. No bank will reverse the transaction. You’re on your own.

An empty digital canyon leading to a locked vault guarded by a broken owl, while legitimate exchanges glow warmly in the distance.

What’s the Real Risk?

The biggest danger isn’t that Avascriptions is a Ponzi scheme - though it could be. The real danger is that it’s a honeypot. You deposit AVAX or $AVASC. You think you’re trading. But the smart contract is designed to lock your funds forever. Or it drains them when you try to withdraw. Or it disappears overnight with no warning.

There’s no evidence it’s been hacked. There’s no evidence it’s been running for years. There’s no evidence anyone made money on it. There’s only evidence that it’s designed to look like a real exchange - but lacks every single component that makes one trustworthy.

What Should You Do?

Don’t deposit anything. Don’t trade $AVASC. Don’t link your wallet. Don’t trust the badge system. Don’t believe the Twitter hype. Don’t follow the Telegram group. If you’ve already sent funds, assume they’re gone and move on.

If you want to trade ASC-20 tokens, use decentralized exchanges on Avalanche like Trader Joe or Pangolin. They’re open-source, audited, and have real user bases. You’ll still take risks - crypto is risky - but at least you’re not risking your money with a team that refuses to identify themselves.

Final Verdict

Avascriptions isn’t a crypto exchange. It’s a warning sign. A red flag wrapped in technical jargon. A website built to look professional while hiding everything that matters: who’s behind it, how it works, and whether your money is safe.

If you see a platform that has no reviews, no audits, no transparency, and is flagged by scam databases - walk away. No amount of “blockchain innovation” or “AVAX ecosystem” buzzwords justifies ignoring the basics of trust.

You don’t need to be a crypto expert to know this: if you can’t find the truth, it’s probably not there.

Is Avascriptions a legitimate crypto exchange?

No. Avascriptions lacks a verified team, public whitepaper, security audits, user reviews, trading data, and regulatory compliance. It’s listed on CryptoLinks’ scam database for hiding its team and lacking transparency. Legitimate exchanges provide all of this information openly.

Can I trust the ASC-20 token trading on Avascriptions?

No. ASC-20 tokens are custom tokens built on Avalanche, but Avascriptions doesn’t prove they’re actively traded or liquid. The badge system based on AVAX volume can’t be verified. Many users report being unable to withdraw funds after depositing. Treat any ASC-20 trading on this platform as high-risk speculation, not investment.

Why is there no information about Avascriptions online?

Legitimate crypto projects generate content, reviews, and media coverage. Avascriptions has none. No crypto news sites mention it. No blockchain auditors have reviewed it. No users post about it on Reddit or Trustpilot. This silence is intentional - it’s how scams avoid scrutiny. The lack of information is a major red flag.

Is $AVASC available on major exchanges like Binance or Coinbase?

No. $AVASC is only listed on smaller, less-regulated exchanges like Bitget. Major exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken require rigorous due diligence before listing tokens. The fact that $AVASC isn’t on any of them confirms it doesn’t meet basic standards for legitimacy or security.

What should I use instead of Avascriptions for trading Avalanche tokens?

Use decentralized exchanges like Trader Joe or Pangolin. They’re open-source, audited, have real user traffic, and operate transparently on the Avalanche network. You can trade ASC-20 tokens safely on these platforms without risking your funds with an anonymous, unverified exchange.

Has Avascriptions been hacked or shut down before?

There’s no public record of a hack, but there’s also no record of it being operational for more than a few months. The website may be active now, but that doesn’t mean it will be tomorrow. Many scam exchanges disappear without warning after collecting deposits. Treat it as potentially inactive at any moment.

Can I get my money back if I lose it on Avascriptions?

Almost certainly not. Without a registered company, legal jurisdiction, or customer support, there’s no path to recovery. Crypto transactions are irreversible. If you send funds to Avascriptions and it turns out to be a scam, your only option is to accept the loss and avoid similar platforms in the future.

Is Avascriptions related to Avalanche (AVAX)?

No. Avascriptions is an independent project that uses the Avalanche blockchain to build its own token standard (ASC-20). Avalanche Foundation has no affiliation with Avascriptions. Just because a project uses AVAX doesn’t mean it’s endorsed or safe. Many scams piggyback on popular blockchains to appear legitimate.

Should I invest in $AVASC as a long-term asset?

No. There’s no utility, no team, no roadmap, and no liquidity data to support $AVASC as a real asset. It’s a speculative token with no backing, created by an anonymous team on a platform with no credibility. Investing in it is gambling, not investing.

How do I avoid similar crypto scams in the future?

Always check for: a public team with LinkedIn profiles, a detailed whitepaper, independent security audits, user reviews on multiple platforms, real trading volume on reputable exchanges, and regulatory compliance. If any of these are missing, walk away. Scams look professional - they’re designed to fool you. Trust the absence of information, not the presence of flashy graphics.

10 Comments
  1. Michael Brooks

    This is one of the clearest breakdowns of a crypto scam I’ve seen in months. No team, no audits, no transparency - it’s not even trying to be legit. If you’re thinking about depositing anything into Avascriptions, just walk away. Your money won’t vanish slowly - it’ll disappear the second you hit confirm.

    And don’t fall for the badge system. Those numbers? Made up. There’s zero on-chain proof. Real exchanges show you the transactions. This one hides behind buzzwords like ‘ASC-20’ like it’s some kind of innovation. It’s not. It’s a shell game.

    Use Trader Joe or Pangolin if you want to trade on Avalanche. They’re open-source, audited, and have real communities. This? Just a website with a fancy logo and a Telegram group full of bots.

  2. Ruby Gilmartin

    Wow. Just wow. This post is basically a textbook case study for how to spot a rug pull before it happens. Every single red flag is here: no whitepaper, no KYC, no liquidity proof, no media coverage, and that damning CryptoLinks listing. This isn’t ‘high risk’ - it’s ‘zero chance of recovery.’

    And the fact that people are making guides to buy $AVASC with credit cards in Zambia? That’s predatory. Targeting regions with weak regulation is the hallmark of organized crypto fraud. This isn’t some startup failing - it’s a criminal operation with a website.

    Stop calling it an ‘exchange.’ It’s a honeypot. And if you’re still thinking about ‘going all in’ because ‘the team is stealthy and innovative’ - you’re not a trader. You’re bait.

  3. William Moylan

    Okay but what if this is a government sting operation? Like, what if Avascriptions is actually run by the NSA or some shadow crypto task force testing how many dumb people will deposit money into a site with zero transparency? I mean, think about it - the timing is too perfect. Right after all those DeFi hacks, suddenly this fake exchange pops up with zero info? Coincidence? I don’t think so.

    They’re luring in the greedy ones so they can track wallets, build profiles, and then shut down the whole ecosystem to ‘clean up’ the market. That’s why there’s no reviews - because no one’s supposed to survive it. The ones who deposit? Their wallets get flagged. The ones who don’t? They’re the ‘smart ones.’

    I’ve seen this before. Back in 2018, they did the same thing with BitConnect. Same silence. Same fake volume. Same ‘we’re on blockchain’ BS. This is the same playbook. Just updated for 2025.

    Don’t just avoid it - report it. To the FBI. To Chainalysis. To the UN. This isn’t just crypto fraud - it’s a national security threat. They’re weaponizing ignorance.

  4. Douglas Tofoli

    bro i just checked the site again and the twitter has 3 followers and the telegram is just 2 people talking to each other and one of them is a bot 😭

    and the ‘legendary badge’ requires 2.5M AVAX??? that’s like $150 million worth?? who even has that much?? and no one’s posted a screenshot of their badge??

    i thought maybe it was just new but nope - even the domain was registered 4 months ago and no one’s written a single review anywhere. not even a ‘this is a scam’ comment. that’s wild.

    also the ‘developer API’ link just goes to a 404. like… what??

    im just gonna stick with trader joe. at least i know my funds aren’t getting sucked into a black hole.

    ps: i almost sent 0.5 AVAX to test it… thank god i stopped 😅

  5. Laura Hall

    I appreciate how thorough this breakdown is. Seriously. It’s rare to see someone lay out the absence of trust signals so clearly instead of just yelling ‘scam.’

    I’ve been in crypto since 2017 and I’ve seen dozens of these. The ones that get me are the ones that sound plausible - they use real tech, they name-drop Avalanche, they have a token standard, they even have a badge system. It’s all designed to trick the technically curious.

    But the silence? That’s the killer. No reviews. No audits. No press. No community. If a project is real, people talk about it - even if they hate it. This? No one’s saying anything because no one’s using it. And that’s the most honest answer you’ll ever get.

    Don’t feel bad if you were tempted. These things are engineered to look good. Just remember: if it’s too quiet, it’s not because it’s quiet - it’s because it’s empty.

  6. David Billesbach

    THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A COINBASE OR BINANCE SHILL OPERATION. THEY’RE TRYING TO CREATE A FAKE SCAM TO MAKE PEOPLE AFRAID OF DECENTRALIZED EXCHANGES SO THEY CAN PUSH THEIR OWN CENTRALIZED PLATFORMS. YOU THINK THEY WANT YOU TO USE TRADER JOE? NO. THEY WANT YOU TO DEPOSIT ON THEIR OWN EXCHANGE WHERE THEY CAN FREEZE YOUR ACCOUNT AND SELL YOUR ASSETS AT A MARKET CRASH.

    LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE - ‘WALK AWAY.’ ‘DON’T DEPOSIT.’ ‘NO LEGAL RECURSE.’ THIS IS THE SAME SCRIPT THEY USE WHEN THEY WANT TO CRUSH A COMPETITOR. Avascriptions might be a front - but the real scam is the fear campaign being pushed by centralized exchanges.

    And why no media coverage? Because CoinDesk and Cointelegraph are owned by the same VCs that fund Binance. They don’t want you to know that decentralized exchanges are safer - they want you to believe they’re all dangerous so you’ll come to them.

    DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH? NO. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH ON WHO’S PUSHING THIS ARTICLE.

    THEY’RE SCARING YOU TO CONTROL YOU.

    AND YES - I’VE BEEN ON THE INSIDE. I SAW THE EMAILS.

  7. Arthur Crone

    Stop wasting time. This isn’t a debate. It’s a corpse. No team. No audit. No volume. No reviews. No jurisdiction. No support. No documentation. No future. That’s it. You don’t need a PhD in blockchain to know this is dead.

    Anyone who still considers depositing is either a scammer themselves or needs to be institutionalized.

    Case closed.

  8. Joanne Lee

    Thank you for the comprehensive and well-researched analysis. The absence of verifiable information is indeed the most telling indicator of risk in decentralized finance. In traditional finance, regulatory disclosure is mandatory; in crypto, transparency is voluntary - and when it’s absent, the burden of proof shifts entirely to the user.

    It’s worth noting that even projects with legitimate intentions often struggle with visibility in their early stages. However, the complete lack of any traceable activity - from blockchain explorer links to community engagement - is unprecedented even among nascent protocols.

    For those unfamiliar with crypto due diligence, the checklist is simple: team transparency, public documentation, third-party verification, and observable on-chain activity. Avascriptions meets none. The absence of these is not negligence - it is a design choice.

    Choosing to invest in such a project is not speculative - it is reckless. And while the market rewards innovation, it does not forgive ignorance.

  9. Rebecca Saffle

    So let me get this straight - you’re telling me that because some website doesn’t have a fancy whitepaper or a team photo, it’s automatically a scam? What about all the other countries where privacy is a right? Why does everything have to be ‘transparent’ like a corporate press release?

    This is America. We don’t trust governments. We don’t trust banks. We don’t trust ‘experts’ who tell us what to do. So now you’re telling me I can’t trust a guy who wants to build something new just because he doesn’t want to put his face on a website?

    You’re not protecting people. You’re enforcing conformity. And if you’re scared of innovation, that’s your problem - not mine.

    I’m putting my AVAX in. If I lose it? Fine. At least I didn’t play it safe like a sheep.

  10. Andy Purvis

    Man I read this whole thing and I just feel sad. Like… someone put a ton of work into making this site look real. The badge system, the API mention, the whole ASC-20 thing - it’s almost impressive how much effort went into the illusion.

    But the silence? The empty Telegram? The 3 followers on Twitter? That’s what kills it. It’s not about being new. It’s about being alone.

    I’ve used platforms that were rough around the edges. But even the worst ones had at least one person saying ‘hey I tried this, here’s what happened.’

    This? Nothing. Just a ghost town with a logo.

    Don’t risk it. But also… don’t be mad at the people who tried. They just wanted to believe.

    And if you’re reading this and thinking ‘but what if it’s real?’ - just ask yourself: what’s the worst that happens if you wait a year?

Write a comment